WORLD
5 min read
Israel's Netanyahu turns to anti-Türkiye rhetoric as polls show Likud losing ground
Netanyahu and his allies are increasingly using anti-Türkiye rhetoric in their election campaign as polls show his Likud party and coalition partners falling short of a parliamentary majority.
Israel's Netanyahu turns to anti-Türkiye rhetoric as polls show Likud losing ground
An activist holds signs during a protest near the White House, on July 28, 2026 [FILE]. / َAA

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is running his election campaign on anti-Türkiye rhetoric after being forced under US pressure to stop attacks on Iran and Lebanon.

Netanyahu, whose name has been linked to corruption allegations and whose party has fallen in public opinion polls, has long sought to avoid prison.

He became the first sitting Israeli prime minister to stand trial for corruption.

Netanyahu, the architect of the genocide in Gaza and responsible for the deaths of more than 73,000 Palestinians, most of them women and children, has been criticised even in Israel for “setting the region on fire to protect his seat.”

The International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu on November 21, 2024, over war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Gaza.

Netanyahu has not stopped at Gaza, launching attacks on regional countries as well.

Under Netanyahu, Israel launched two separate attacks on Lebanon, one in 2024 and another in 2026.

He also opened two wars against Iran, one in 2025 and the other in 2026.

Netanyahu was also behind attacks on Yemen and Qatar, which mediated ceasefire talks between Hamas and Israel.

After the fall of the Bashar al Assad regime, Israel under Netanyahu carried out many attacks on Syria’s military infrastructure in 2024 and occupied some areas in southern Syria.

RelatedTRT World - Türkiye, 11 other countries slam Israeli strikes on Syria

‘Not a prime minister, but a puppet’

Netanyahu, who has maintained power through attacks and wars, first ended attacks on Iran reluctantly under US pressure after an agreement between Washington and Tehran.

The decision drew sharp criticism from his coalition partners and opposition leaders.

Former Israeli prime minister Yair Lapid, leader of the main opposition Yesh Atid party, criticised the US-Iran agreement and said Netanyahu had “lost the war.”

Netanyahu’s image as a “strong leader” weakened after he was forced to end the war with Iran under US pressure.

He was later forced to stop attacks on Lebanon, again at Washington’s request.

The decision pushed Netanyahu further into a corner in Israel.

Former defence minister Avigdor Lieberman criticised the ceasefire reached in Lebanon, targeting Netanyahu by saying: “Not a prime minister, but a puppet.”

Itamar Ben-Gvir, Netanyahu’s far-right coalition partner and national security minister, called on the Israeli premier to reject US President Donald Trump’s demand.

“You said a strong prime minister says ‘yes’ to the US president when possible and ‘no’ when necessary. Now is the time to say ‘no’ to our friend, President Trump,” Ben-Gvir said.

Netanyahu’s Likud party is currently the largest party in Israel’s 120-seat parliament with 32 seats.

But opinion polls for elections scheduled for October 27 show Likud falling from 32 seats to 23 and becoming the second-largest party.

Polls also show Likud and Netanyahu’s far-right and ultra-Orthodox coalition partners far below the 61 seats needed to form a government.

A poll published by Israel’s Channel 13 on August 19 showed Netanyahu and his coalition partners winning a total of 51 seats.

RelatedTRT World - How a desperate Netanyahu is trying to project Türkiye as a security threat in poll-bound Israel

Anti-Türkiye rhetoric

Netanyahu and his team turned to anti-Türkiye rhetoric after being forced by US pressure to end the attacks on Iran and Lebanon.

The signals came weeks before Israel’s August 18 attack on the inactive Abu al-Duhur military air base in Syria’s Idlib province.

Amichai Chikli, a Likud lawmaker and diaspora minister, claimed in a radio interview in June that Israel would “sooner or later enter a war with Syria.”

“Türkiye and Syria are far more disturbing developments than Iran,” Chikli said.

Chikli, who often draws attention with anti-Türkiye posts, also voiced unease over the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement signed by Türkiye, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.

He said Saudi Arabia’s move to act with Türkiye was a “very bad development” for Israel.

Defence Minister Yisrael Katz, one of Netanyahu’s closest figures, has also emerged as a leading figure using anti-Türkiye rhetoric against Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in the election campaign.

Katz frequently targets Türkiye and Erdogan on social media, and many of his posts are in Turkish.

Eli Cohen, a Likud lawmaker and energy minister, also signalled last month that anti-Türkiye rhetoric would be used in the campaign.

“If Türkiye establishes a base in Syria, we will establish one too,” Cohen told a local radio station.

Netanyahu and his team have visibly increased anti-Türkiye statements since Israel’s attack on the Abu al-Duhur military air base.

‘Arrogant and dangerous’

Some opposition leaders and analyses published in Israel agree that Netanyahu and people close to him have turned the attack in Syria into an election campaign by using anti-Türkiye rhetoric.

Democrats party leader Yair Golan said Netanyahu made an “arrogant and dangerous” move with the attack.

Golan said Israel “raised tensions with Türkiye and deepened the rift with the US,” stressing that Netanyahu used military force for political calculations and that Tel Aviv paid the price in security terms.

Former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak said Netanyahu was pursuing a policy of reaching voters through security tensions ahead of the October 27 elections.

Israeli political commentator Esther Solomon said in an analysis published in Haaretz newspaper that Netanyahu had failed to get the poll results he wanted “despite all his efforts” before the elections.

Solomon said Netanyahu was trying to gain more votes by using every front to “overwhelm, surprise and wear down the opposition” to build momentum for his party before the elections.

Another political commentator, Jonathan Lis, said in Haaretz that political considerations also played a role in Netanyahu’s decision-making process alongside security and diplomatic parameters.

“As Israel’s October elections approach, it is highly suspicious that Netanyahu would want an escalation of tensions with Türkiye and Syria, especially as the Trump administration encourages calm between the parties,” Lis said.

SOURCE:َAA