US House approves Biden's record defence budget

US House version of the bill adds $27 billion more to the Biden administration's request of an historic $813 billion to fund defence-related programmes in other departments.

Lawmakers approve provisions to repeal the 2002 Iraq War authorisation and raise the troops' pay by 4.6 percent.
Reuters

Lawmakers approve provisions to repeal the 2002 Iraq War authorisation and raise the troops' pay by 4.6 percent.

The US House of Representatives has passed a bill paving the way for the defence budget to exceed $800 billion next year, authorising $37 billion in spending on top of the record $773 billion proposed by President Joe Biden. 

The House passed on Thursday its version of the National Defense Authorization Act, or NDAA, which sets policy for the Pentagon, by a vote of 329-101. 

The Senate has yet to pass its version, but the Senate Armed Services Committee has already backed an even larger increase, $45 billion, over Biden's proposal.

The two chambers will decide the ultimate level when they meet in conference at a future date. Their compromise bill would come up for a vote in both chambers later in the year.

The NDAA, one of the only major pieces of legislation Congress passes annually, is closely watched by a broad swath of industry and other interests because it determines everything from purchases of ships and aircraft to pay increases for soldiers and how to address geopolitical threats.

READ MORE: China to raise its military spending by 7 percent

Spending too much on military

Lawmakers also approved provisions to repeal the 2002 Iraq War authorisation and raise the troops' pay by 4.6 percent. 

It would also put into law Biden's executive order raising the minimum wage for federal contractors to $15 per hour.

The bill faced opposition from lawmakers who objected to increasing Pentagon spending.

"On the whole, the National Defense Authorization Act exemplifies the basic fact that we spend far too much on military-first solutions and far too little on diplomacy and on human needs at home and around the globe," said Democratic Representative Andy Levin, a leader of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, who voted no. 

READ MORE: Weapons lobbying in the US is corruption by another name

READ MORE: Analysis: Why the new US defence budget is fixated on Baku

Loading...
Route 6