Plea agreement could spare 9/11 defendants from facing death penalty

The suspected architect of September 11, 2001, attacks and his fellow defendants may never face the death penalty under plea agreements now under consideration to bring an end to their more than decadelong prosecution, the Pentagon and FBI have advised families of some of the thousands killed.

The notice, made in a letter that was sent to several of the families and obtained by The Associated Press, comes one and half years after military prosecutors and defence lawyers began exploring a negotiated resolution to the case.

The prosecution of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four others held at the US detention centre in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, has been troubled by repeated delays and legal disputes, especially over the legal ramifications of the interrogation under torture that the men initially underwent while in CIA custody.

No trial date has been set.

"The Office of the Chief Prosecutor has been negotiating and is considering entering into pre-trial agreements," or PTAs, the letter said.

It told the families that while no plea agreement "has been finalised, and may never be finalised, it is possible that a PTA, in this case, would remove the possibility of the death penalty."

Some of the relatives of the nearly 3,000 people killed in the terror attacks expressed outrage over the prospect of ending the case short of a verdict.

The military prosecutors pledged to take their views into consideration and present them to the military authorities, who would make the final decision on accepting any plea agreement.

The letter, dated August 1, was received by at least some of the family members only this week.

It asks them to respond by Monday to the FBI's victim services division with any comments or questions about the possibility of such a plea agreement.

'Little hope'

On September 11, 2001, conspirators from the al Qaeda militant group seized control of jets to use them as passenger-filled missiles, hitting New York's World Trade Center and the Pentagon near Washington.

A fourth plane was headed for Washington but crashed in Pennsylvania after crew members and passengers tried to storm the cockpit.

It was Mohammed who presented the very idea of such an attack on the United States to al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, and who received authorisation from bin Laden to craft what became the 9/11 attacks, the United States 9/11 Commission concluded.

The four other defendants are alleged to have supported the hijackers in various ways.

The attacks led to the US "war on terror," which included US invasions and prolonged wars in Afghanistan, where al Qaeda was based, and in Iraq, which had no connection with the attacks.

Jim Riches, who lost his firefighter son Jimmy in 9/11, went to Guantanamo for pretrial hearings in 2009.

He remains deeply frustrated that the case remains unresolved 14 years later.

He said he laughed bitterly when he opened the government’s letter Monday. "How can you have any faith in it?" Riches asked.

The update "gives us a little hope," he said, but justice still seems far off.

"No matter how many letters they send, until I see it, I won’t believe it," said Riches, a retired deputy fire chief in New York City.

The Obama administration at one point sought to do so, but the idea was shelved because of opposition from some victims’ relatives and members of Congress and city officials’ concerns about security costs.

Seeking responsibility

Other family members — part of a network of 9/11 families that has pushed for answers and accountability over the years — said they would insist that any plea agreement allow their lawyers to question the defendants on the extent of any Saudi official involvement in 9/11.

Saudi Arabia denies involvement by senior Saudi officials.

It's about "holding people responsible, and they're taking that away with this plea," said Peter Brady, whose father was killed in the attack.

He received the letter this week.

The case "needs to go through the legal process," not be settled in a plea deal, Brady said.

The 9/11 hearings have been on hold while military officials examine whether one of the defendants is competent to stand trial.

The five defendants were captured at various times and places in 2002 and 2003 and sent to Guantanamo for trial in 2006.

The case has played out with a changing series of defence lawyers and judges, all grappling with the legalities and logistics of the military trial.

Much of the hearings have been mired in litigation over how much of the testimony should be considered inadmissible by the torture that defendants underwent in early CIA custody, including the waterboarding of Mohammad 183 times.